The Vampire Renaissance

Dracula – How Twentieth Century Actors Paved the Way for Twilight

6 Comments
Join the Conversation
Max Schrek as Count Orlok Nosferatu 1922 - Paruccini
Max Schrek as Count Orlok Nosferatu 1922 - Paruccini
The vampire wars are here. Having seemingly evolved in a vampire-like renaissance, each generation has been bitten by a different creature of the night.

Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson, Twilight) or Count Orlok (Max Schrek, Nosferatu)? In the looks department there is little contest (hopefully), but what about the fear factor? Count Orlok could effortlessly spur any woman to beat the world record 100-meter dash in nightgown, slippers and rollers. Therein is the difference. Advocates of the original vampire movies seem to absolutely loathe what the modern vampire has become. Teenagers however, cannot get enough and are just begging to be bitten.

At the end of the day, the vampire renaissance is probably here to stay, but tribute can still be paid to the origins of the vampire movie and the actors that starred in them, for without them, Edward Cullen might never have made it out of print.

Nosferatu – 1922

Nosferatu was not the first vampire movie ever made but the third. It is however, the most successful of the three and still sends shivers down the spine.

Based (loosely) on Bram Stoker’s novel Dracula, Max Schrek’s portrayal of Count Orlok, a bushy-eye browed, anorexic vampire with rat-like teeth is a marvel considering the entire movie was silent. Schrek loomed exceptionally well and that stare! The movie is eighty plus years old and still that stare can cause many to choke on the popcorn. Classic.

  • Title: Nosferatu, eine Symphonie des Grauens
  • Release date: June 3 1929 (USA)
  • Director: F.W. Murnau
  • Writer: Henrik Galeen (writer)

Dracula – 1931

The 1931 version of Dracula was the first vampire movie with sound and introduced us to Bela Lugosi's famous line (with the accent now), "Listen to them. Children of the night. What music they make." Of course being Hungarian gave Lugosi an air of authenticity and having starred in the 1927 stage production of Dracula, the movie role was a simple step. Lugosi's genre was horror movies and when he died in 1956, he was buried in the black cape used in the Dracula movie.

  • Title: Dracula
  • Release Date: February 14 1931 (USA)
  • Director: Tod Browning
  • Writers: Bram Stoker adapted by Hamilton Deane

The Horror of Dracula – 1958

Robert Pattinson will always be known as Edward Cullen, but Christopher Lee, will indelibly be seen as the definitive Count Dracula. British film studio, Hammer Film Productions, first cast Lee in the 1958 film, Horror of Dracula. It would launch his career as one of the most memorable vampires in history.

Lee has played Dracula a total of ten times, more than any other actor ever and seven of those were courtesy of Hammer Studios. He is probably the first vampire character to be seen as debonair but dangerous. Shame he always got killed.

Sir Christopher Lee, as he is now known, was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II in 2009. Not quite a Count, but just as good.

  • Title: The Horror of Dracula
  • Director: Terence Fisher
  • Writers: Jimmy Sangster based on the novel by Bram Stoker
  • Release Date: May 8 1958 (USA)

Bram Stoker's Dracula – 1992

Director Francis Ford Coppola’s, 1992 version of Bram Stoker’s book was a cinematic marvel and a feast for the eyes. Packed with stars Gary Oldman, Keanu Reeves, Winona Ryder and Sir Anthony Hopkins, vampire fans seemed to either love it or hate it. Oldman certainly had the portrayal dead on, but did he have the charisma? The debate will probably continue for some time to come.

Ryder did make a delightful Mina and Hopkins sarcasm was quite frankly, hilarious. The Academy loved it, awarding it three Oscars, but Oldman as Dracula will always be a preference for some and not for others.

  • Title: Bram Stoker's Dracula
  • Director: Francis Ford Coppola
  • Writers: James V. Hart based on the novel by Bram Stoker
  • Release Date: November 13 1992 (USA)

Bram Stoker

When Bram Stoker put pen to paper in 1897 and created his classic vampire story, he probably never envisioned his title character dominating the imagination for over one hundred years. Despite the passage of those years and the variations in temperament, personality and disposition, the vampire genre will eternally be slave to one single vampire, the incomparable and supreme master of all, Count Dracula.

June is going to be the start of a scorching summer for vampire fans with True Blood returning to HBO and the release of Twilight: Eclipse in cinemas. Stay tuned for updates.

Sources:

Vampires: A Chronology. Melton, Gordon. J

House of Horrors. Hammer Horror.

Elizabeth and Streak, Elizabeth Batt

Elizabeth Batt - Elizabeth Batt is a former large animal nurse, certified NREMT, lover of equines and conservationist.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 2+5?

Comments

Feb 18, 2010 5:53 PM
Guest :
Forgot some notables:
There WERE steps along the way towards a sympathetic cinematic vampire: Barnabas Collins (Dark Shadows); Nick Knight (Forever Knight); Angel and Spike (Buffy the Vampire Slayer; Angel); even to an extent "Blade". However, they all had their evil side to battle, that kept them from being completely humane and lovable. Definitely no sparkles!
Feb 18, 2010 8:16 PM
Elizabeth Batt :
Absolutely agree! Haven't done yet, this is the first of a series of articles. I appreciate your input and comments and will certainly be adding your input. Thanks for reading and stopping by!
Feb 23, 2010 5:05 PM
Guest :
I like both types of vampires in their own way I suppose. I wonder which one people think is the most scariest? Or most good looking?
Apr 9, 2010 9:59 AM
Guest :
Thank you so much for writing this article, it has helped me with my college course very much - which I am writing a project about the change in vampire films. This has been very useful. Thank you again
Apr 9, 2010 2:48 PM
Elizabeth Batt :
You're very welcome, glad it helped! Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. Good luck with your project!
Sep 22, 2010 2:40 AM
Guest :
Good article! I have to say that in my opinion it sticks in my throat to consider Edward Cullen a vampire. It's just all wrong! I love vampires through the ages, from their nosferatu beginnings to the more likeable characters today. Although many writers (books and screen) have deviated a little from lore, the basic characteristics always remain the same. The Twilight saga deviated too much for my liking, creating a new being that given any other name would maybe have been likeable to me, but labelled as a vampire has left me feeling a little cheated!
6 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement